After Ned’s death, Marian’s concerned family sends her to a resort in the Canadian Rockies, an area she loves and used to visit with her mother. At the resort she meets an older man named Dan Forrester (Frank Morgan), who quickly falls in love with her. But can Marian find love again after losing her fiancé?
A Lost Lady was directed by Alfred E. Green. The film is based on a novel of the same name by Willa Cather, a prominent American author known for her portraits of life in the West, including My Ántonia.
Note: This review contains minor spoilers.
For Barbara’s birthday (July 16 — that’s today, for those of you reading this post on the day I publish it!), Turner Classic Movies honored the actress on July 15 with a “Stanwyck in the ’30s” tribute, airing nine of her films from that decade. Having seen all of the other films that were airing, I knew I couldn’t miss A Lost Lady. (I also did a re-watch of Annie Oakley, which I’ll be making a post about in the very near future.)
Marian has to be one of Stanwyck’s most interesting characters from the early ’30s — not an easy feat, considering the number of great performances she gave and fascinating films she took part in during this period of her career. Marian is a complex woman, and though the film’s run-time is brief, Stanwyck injects multiple layers into the character.
Neither party is under the illusion that the Marian/Dan relationship will be a passionate one; Dan gets a pretty companion whose company he truly enjoys, and Marian gets a secure marriage without the burden of opening herself up to such severe heartbreak and loss again. She’s honest with Dan about her feelings from the get-go, telling him upfront that she will never love him, and that she doesn’t think she can love anyone after what happened to Ned.The film spells this out very clearly through dialogue, perhaps a bit too clearly. It’s Stanwyck that has a real impact on the viewer, making sure the film is emotional rather than wooden even as her character’s feelings are A-B-C’d by the script.
As is the case with many of Stanwyck’s films, her performance is the shining light here. I’ve become a firm believer that there’s no such thing as a bad Stanwyck film, because they’re always worth watching for her performances at the very least. This one reminded me why she’s my favorite actress: she performs with sincerity, regardless of her co-stars, the script, the director, or any of the many factors that play into the success or failure of a screen story.
That’s not to say Stanwyck is the only good thing about this film. The story is undoubtedly an oversimplified, cut-and-dry version of Cather’s more intricately-told tale,* but the film holds the viewer’s attention well, moving between plot points swiftly so as not to waste much of its 61-minute run time. Frank Morgan and Ricardo Cortez both give solid performances, though neither can compete with Stanwyck’s screen presence.
A Lost Lady is not just the story of a woman who loses her fiance; it’s a powerful, if brief, exploration of the unpredictability and foolish nature of that pesky emotion we call love. As Dan tells Marian: “Love is something we can’t command. We can’t twist it to fit into our own designs.” It’s an enduringly relevant sentiment, its impact heightened by Stanwyck’s portrayal of the cynical-but-not-heartless Marian. The score: 3.5/5
*Note: I haven’t read the novel A Lost Lady, but have read enough Cather to know that this film must barely scratch the surface of what she wrote. It gets wrapped up in a very “Hollywood” ending, too, which I assume differs from the novel by some measure. TCM notes that Cather was unhappy with both this and the 1925 adaptation of A Lost Lady, deciding after viewing this film not to let any more of her books be turned into movies.