Rome Adventure (1962)

Prudence Bell (Suzanne Pleshette), an assistant librarian at a New England school, is being reprimanded for recommending a book called Lovers Must Learn to a student. Standing up for herself and the book, she ultimately chooses to resign and jets off to Rome, to meet people who truly understand the meaning of love.

(Image via iTunes)

On the boat over from New York, Pru meets Albert Stillwell (Hampton Fancher) — who has been asked to keep an eye on her by her mother — and Roberto Orlandi (Rossano Brazzi), a handsome man from Rome.

After arriving in Italy, Albert and Pru check into their boarding house, where they meet American architect Don Porter (Troy Donahue). At first, Don is somewhat annoyed by Pru, who listens to her Italian lessons too loudly. But eventually, a friendship grows. Could it turn into love, or will Pru instead find romance with Albert or Roberto?

Rome Adventure was directed by Delmer Daves, who also adapted the screenplay from a 1932 novel.

I watched Rome Adventure on Valentine’s Day, hoping for a bit of romantic fluff. What I got instead was a fairly slow and quiet romantic drama, with a few turns toward melodrama as it moves along. It isn’t quite an “adventure,” nor a well-written or well-plotted film, but it is immensely watchable.

Sure, its message is messy by modern standards. It dumps its opening scene’s premise of fighting against literary censorship and devolves into a love triangle between a “bad girl” and a “good girl.” Then there’s Roberto, who spends far too much time giving speeches about the differences between men and women, and the proper roles of each.

But, there are positive aspects, too. The cinematography is gorgeous, showcasing sights from throughout Italy, not only Rome. The beautiful scenery and tour guide-style narration as Pru visits the sites (on her own and with Don) lend a sort of travelogue feel to the film.

(Image via Brian’s Drive-In Theater)

I found Pru to be surprisingly relatable, despite the fact that the film implausibly revolves around her jet-setting to Europe to find romance after unsuccessfully fighting the censorship of an “obscene” romantic book and quitting her job. She’s a hopeless romantic but also a doubtful one, unsure that she’s capable of recognizing the “right one.” Her journey may not quite be common, what with the high cost of plane rides and hotels, but her motivations and dreams are familiar.

There’s also the character of Daisy, who I love (portrayed by Constance Ford). Can we go back in time and get a whole film about Daisy’s bookshop-founding years and romantic adventures? She runs a bookshop. With a dog. In Italy! In other words, she’s living my dream life, and deserves to have her own story more thoroughly told.

Aside from the messiness of the script, Rome Adventure fails in other ways. Though there’s nice chemistry between Pru and Don, much of the dialogue seems wooden, especially from Troy Donahue. A great cast can elevate sub-par material, but that doesn’t happen here, despite Pleshette’s best efforts.

I can’t say I’d necessarily recommend Rome Adventure if you’re looking for a great, swoon-worthy romance to tune in for… but if you just want to sit back and zone out while watching beautiful scenes of midcentury Italy, or want to become envious of Daisy’s life as I did, it’s good for that.

5 thoughts on “Rome Adventure (1962)

  1. I’ve never heard of this one before. This sounds like a film I would love. Looks like an incredible cast. I really enjoyed your review.


  2. So was this a steal of ‘Roman Holiday’? Were you reminded of that film while watching this one? Either way, it still sounds like fun…any chance to see Italy (and Suzanne Pleshette) from that time period is okay in my book. And Hampton Fancher…the same guy who years later would write the first-draft screenplay of ‘Blade Runner’!


  3. I saw this film on Warner Archive for the first time recently and I have to agree completely with your review. I never had seen a Troy Donahue film I didn’t love and I’m such a fangirl of Suzanne Pleshette so, with that said, I was hoping the plot would be something magical but it was just.. lacking something. Definitely agree, now that you mention it, that Daisy had the more interesting background and a whole film should’ve been devoted to her character. If I feel like seeing Troy & Suzanne, I think I’ll just stick to “A Distant Trumpet” because I thoroughly enjoyed that one. :)


Share your thoughts! (Note: Comments close 90 days after publication.)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.