Remaking the Classics: Out of the Past (1947) and Against All Odds (1984)

I never hear anyone talk about the remake of Out of the Past, probably because Out of the Past is practically sacred territory among classic film buffs.

ootp

(Image via Celluloid Pop Culture Junkie)

The 1947 noir is a film that I, personally, adore. Everything about it is great: the photography, the dialogue, the performances, the drama, the chemistry! It’s a well-made film in every facet.

For those unfamiliar, Out of the Past tells the twist-laden tale of Jeff (Robert Mitchum), a private eye hired by a gangster named Whit (Kirk Douglas) to track down his mistress. Kathie (Jane Greer), the woman in question, has skipped town and apparently stolen $40,000 from Whit. Jeff manages to track her down in Mexico, but things get complicated when he falls for her.

Jane Greer packs a dramatic punch (and a pistol) in her role of Kathie. The cabin shooting scene, in which she plays a crucial role, is one of my favorite movie scenes of all time. Douglas is conniving and smarmy as Whit, and Mitchum brings an ease and confidence to the role of Jeff, even when he’s in danger.

The remake, 1984’s Against All Odds, begins in Mexico, jumping right into Terry’s (Jeff Bridges) search for Jessie (Rachel Ward) before giving context in flashback land. In a somewhat strange addition, there’s a subplot involving football, Bridges’ lead character made a struggling would-be football star rather than a small-time private eye. Jane Greer makes an appearance as the mother of Jessie, married to none other than Richard Widmark (as “Ben Caxton”), while Paul Valentine of the original cast also makes a cameo.

aao

(Image via Cheerful Cynicism)

Part of what makes Out of the Past so great is its tightly-written script and the tension that is built from the get-go. The remake lacks these attributes. An attempt is made to add more backstory, with drug addictions and family dramas. These are interesting choices to flesh out the film, but feel very artificial and contribute to the pacing problem. The chemistry between Ward and Bridges is also much lower than that of Greer and Mitchum, despite the comparative censorship of the ’40s.

It’s not all bad in Against All Odds, though. Though Woods is your typical insecure, ’80s douchebag villain, nowhere near as intimidating as Douglas was in the equivalent role, I found Jeff Bridges quite likable. He plays the role much differently than Mitchum, which suits the twist of him having so little experience as a private eye. I also loved Jane Greer in her new role, as mother rather than femme fatale. Her confident, take-no-bull character is a highlight, and does somewhat recall her performance in the 1947 film.

The remake also makes great use of settings in Mexico, spending much more time there than Mitchum and Greer did in the original film, including scenes at well-known historic sites like Chichen Itza.

aao2

(Image via Daily Grindhouse)

So, it’s an okay ’80s crime flick. In addition to the differences and issues noted above, perhaps the most troubling for fans of the classic will be the softening of the female lead. Ward’s characterization is far less evil and calculating than Greer’s “Kathie.” And that ending, complete with a romantic pop ballad (Phil Collins shouting “Take a look at me now-ow-ow!” in his soundtrack tune)! Not even a tenth of the impact of Out of the Past‘s much more dramatic and deadly finish.

Fans of Out of the Past are far less likely to enjoy this remake than those who saw it in theaters in the ’80s or have a fondness for films of that decade. I’d say skip Against All Odds if you’re a devotee of the original film, unless you have a particular interest in remakes.

ootp2

(Image via So It Goes Mag)

 

 

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Remaking the Classics: Out of the Past (1947) and Against All Odds (1984)

  1. gary loggins says:

    “Against All Odds” does pale in comparison to “Out of the Past”. If you take the remake on it’s own terms, it’s not a bad 80’s flick. But we classic movie lovers can’t do that, can we!!

    Like

    • Lindsey says:

      Yep, I came to the same conclusion. Since I watched them in the same week, its flaws in comparison to the original were particularly obvious to me, but it’s a decent watch when judged individually. And I have a soft spot for anything ’80s, so I enjoyed it!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Eric Binford says:

    Is it okay to say that I like both movies? The 1947 film is great, but I quite liked the remake. In fact, I saw Against All Odds first. I thought the Bridges-Ward-Woods triangle was very good, and being an ’80s kid, I loved the soundtrack too.

    Like

      • Eric Binford says:

        Out of the Past is great! Anyhow, I feel the same way about The Postman Always Rings Twice — I like both versions (1946 & 1981). I also like the unofficial Italian version, Ossessione (1943). :)

        Like

  3. Todd B says:

    Consider it skipped! I would have to say that ‘Out of the Past’ is my favorite noir movie, and I agree with everything you say about it (I think it’s one of the more perfect examples of noir), so I’m not sure I’d care too much about a remake. Actually, I think I was going to see ‘Against All Odds’ when it came out in theaters (before I knew anything about the existence of film noir), but for some reason I never made it that far…perhaps it was the constant radio play of ‘Take A Look At Me Now’ that drove me away!

    Like

Share your thoughts! (Note: Comments close 90 days after publication.)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s